DragRace.com.au
Holden Commodore SS (VF)RWD · 304 kW
Ford Falcon GT-F 351RWD · 351 kW
Watch the run Video: Dab Dab Goose on YouTube
The on-paper callOn paper, the Ford Falcon GT-F 351 has the edge with 351 kW and a quarter-mile time of 12.6 seconds compared to the Commodore SS's 304 kW and 13.0 seconds. That’s a solid 0.4-second difference in the quarter-mile. Expect the Falcon to pull ahead if both drivers launch cleanly.

Tale of the tape

Holden Commodore SS (VF)
¼ mile
13.0s
0–100 km/h
4.9s
Power
304 kW
Drivetrain
RWD
Ford Falcon GT-F 351
¼ mile
12.6s
0–100 km/h
4.5s
Power
351 kW
Drivetrain
RWD

The matchup

This matchup features two iconic Aussie V8s, representing the last of their kind. The Holden Commodore SS (VF) is beloved for its raw power and RWD layout, while the Ford Falcon GT-F 351 serves as a fitting farewell to the Blue Oval's performance legacy. Both cars embody a rich history of Australian muscle that fans can’t get enough of.

Off the line

The first 60 feet will be crucial, and the Falcon GT-F 351, with its stronger 351 kW, should have the advantage off the line. Its quicker 0-100 km/h time of 4.5 seconds suggests it can deliver torque more effectively than the Commodore's 4.9 seconds. Expect the Falcon to get the holeshot if the drivers manage their launches well.

The back half

As they approach the back half of the strip, the Falcon's power-to-weight ratio will likely come into play, allowing it to maintain its lead. With its higher power output, it should continue to stretch the gap unless the Commodore finds a way to close it through shifting or gearing. The Falcon GT-F's gearing could help it maintain momentum, while the Commodore may struggle to keep pace in the final stretch.

The x-factor

Driver skill will be the wildcard here; a better launch or shift could sway the outcome. Track conditions and weather can also impact performance, especially for the Commodore, which might be more sensitive to heat soak. Battery state is less of a concern for these petrol-powered beasts, but any slight advantage could make a difference.

Check out the embedded video to see how these two legends perform against each other.

Questions from the fence line

Which is faster in a drag race?

The Ford Falcon GT-F 351 is faster on paper with a quarter-mile time of 12.6 seconds compared to the Holden Commodore SS's 13.0 seconds.

What drivetrain do these cars use?

Both the Holden Commodore SS and Ford Falcon GT-F 351 feature rear-wheel drive (RWD) layouts.

What makes the Falcon GT-F special?

The Falcon GT-F is notable as a performance send-off for Ford in Australia, packing 351 kW.

From the merch trailer
Race-day tees, built for the fence line.
Original designs — no trademarks, all attitude.
Browse the shop

More races on this card

Ford Falcon XR6 Turbo (FG) vs Holden Commodore SS (VF) 13.2s vs 13.0s HSV GTS (Gen-F) vs Ford Falcon GT-F 351 12.3s vs 12.6s Holden Commodore SS (VF) vs Nissan Skyline GT-R R34 13.0s vs 13.1s